Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 10;8(11):1937. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111937

Table 3.

Multiple comparison among binomial logistic regression models depending on MCI classification with odds ratio.

Model Coefficient (β) Odds Ratio 95% CI p Value
Model I
Age (years) −0.27 0.77 0.66, 0.89 0.000
TMT-B (s) 0.08 1.09 1.04, 1.14 0.001
SDST (score) −0.12 0.88 0.80, 0.97 0.012
TDAS total score (score) 0.65 1.91 1.37, 2.68 0.000
Model II
Age (years) −0.26 0.77 0.67, 0.88 0.000
WR (score) −0.55 0.58 0.44, 0.76 0.000
TMT-A (s) 0.17 1.19 1.07, 1.33 0.001
TMT-B (s) 0.05 1.05 1.01, 1.10 0.025
GDS-15 total score (score) 0.32 1.37 1.07, 1.77 0.014
Model III
Walking speed (m/s) −2.29 0.10 0.02, 0.69 0.020
GDS-15 total score (score) 0.20 1.22 1.04, 1.43 0.015

Reference group for analysis was non-MCI group. Model I: Model χ2 test, p < 0.0001; The Hosmer–Lemeshow test, p = 0.12; Percentage of correct classifications = 87.4%. Model II: Model χ2 test, p < 0.0001; The Hosmer–Lemeshow test, p = 0.84; Percentage of correct classifications = 84.5%. Model III: Model χ2 test, p = 0.002; The Hosmer–Lemeshow test, p = 0.02; Percentage of correct classifications = 59.2%. CI, confidence interval; WR, word recognition; TMT-A, Trail Making Test A version; TMT-B, Trail Making Test B version; SDST, Symbol Digit Substitution Task; TDAS, Touch Panel-type Dementia Assessment Scale; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale-15.