Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Sep 28;73(12):1108–1115. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212474

Table 2.

Higher prevalence of probiotic bacterial taxa among current-smokers than among never-smokers and former-smokers

Probiotic taxa Prevalence P value* (PBonferroni)
Current-smokers (n=592) Former-smokers (n=477) Never-smokers (n=547) Current-smokers versus never-smokers Former-smokers versus never-smokers Current-smokers versus non-smokers
Phylum Actinobacteria
 Genus Bifidobacterium 85.64% 71.07% 67.28% 2.30×10−6 (1.59×10−4) 0.88 (1.00) 2.09×10−7 (1.44×10−5)
 Species Bifidobacterium longum 67.57% 45.07% 39.67% 2.61×10−11 (1.80×10−9) 0.32 (1.00) 2.91×10−12 (2.01×10−10)
Phylum Firmicutes
 Genus Lactobacillus 89.36% 73.38% 73.49% 2.62×10−6 (1.81×10−4) 0.46 (1.00) 1.15×10−7 (7.91×10−6)
 Species Lactobacillus crispatus 61.15% 35.43% 34.37% 2.60×10−10 (1.80×10−8) 0.72 (1.00) 3.85×10−13 (2.66×10−11)
 Species L. fermentum 57.60% 39.83% 35.65% 2.09×10−6 (1.44×10−4) 0.56 (1.00) 4.59×10−7 (3.16×10−5)
 Species L. gasseri 72.47% 56.39% 53.02% 6.51×10−6 (4.50×10−4) 0.95 (1.00) 7.51×10−7 (5.18×10−5)
 Species L. oris 43.75% 26.83% 20.84% 1.09×10−8 (7.54×10−7) 0.04 (1.00) 3.46×10−8 (2.39×10−6)
 Species L. panis 42.23% 26.83% 25.41% 3.74×10−7 (2.58×10−5) 0.81 (1.00) 2.33×10−7 (1.61×10−5)
 Species L. reuteri 41.55% 23.27% 20.84% 1.65×10−8 (1.14×10−6) 0.99 (1.00) 5.36×10−10 (3.70×10−8)
*

P values were calculated by logistic regression. Sequencing batch as well as other covariates (age, sex, race, BMI, alcohol consumption, oral health and disease status at the first follow-up and total energy intake) were adjusted for.

Bonferroni correction, adjusted for 69 independent tests.

Non-smokers includes former-smokers and never-smokers.

BMI, body mass index.