Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec;5(6):a004424. doi: 10.1101/mcs.a004424

Table 1.

Genomic findings

Gene CHR:POS HGVS cDNA HGVS protein Variant type Predicted effect Variant allele frequency (Alt/Ref allele read count) Read depth of variant
BRAF 7:140477836 NM_004333.4:c.1457_1471del ATGTGACAGCACCTA NP_004324.2: p.Asn486_ Pro490del In frame deletion Activating mutation (Foster et al. 2016) WGS: 66% (68/35)
WES: 64% (77/44)
WGS: 103×
WES: 121×
CDKN2A 9:21971120 NM_001195132.1:c.238C>T NP_001182061.1: p.Arg80a Nonsense Variant of uncertain significance likely loss of function (Rachakonda et al. 2013; Yarbrough et al. 1999) WGS: 62% (48/29)
WES: 66% (165/84)
WGS: 77×
WES: 249×
TP53 17:7579380 NM_000546.5:c.299_306del AGAAAACC NP_000537: p.Gln100Leufs Ter46 Frame shift Variant of uncertain significance likely oncogenic (Chakravarty et al. 2017) WGS: 56% (42/33)
WES: 52% (82/76)
WGS: 75×
WES: 158×
SMAD4 18q21.2 NM_005359.5 NM_005350.1 Homozygous deletion Loss of function (Jia et al. 2017) Copy-number log2(T/N) = −1.624 WGS (18q mean coverage): 96×

aTermination (stop) codon (https://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/standards.html).