Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 12;27(1):81–88. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz150

Table 3.

Results from the manual analysis of the originally assigned subject headings and the headings predicted by the best-performing classifier (BidirLSTM) for 200 randomly selected sentences.

Class Original headings Predicted headings by BidirLSTM
1. Correct 0.7400 (148) 0.8150 (163)
2. Maybe correct 0.1500 (30) 0.1300 (26)
3. Incorrect 0.0850 (17) 0.0450 (9)
4. Unable to assess 0.0250 (5) 0.0100 (2)
Automatic evaluation R@1, accuracy (predicted equals original heading) 0.5800 (116)

Values are decimal (n). The bottom row shows how the classifier performs on these 200 sentences using the R@1 automatic evaluation metric (accuracy).