Table 3.
EWL% 1 aa | Sex | Volume resected (mL) | BMI 1 aa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL% (1 year) | Pearson correlation | 1 | 0.149 | 0.167 | -0.872(∗∗) |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.217 | 0.168 | 0.000 | ||
N | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | |
| |||||
Sex | Pearson correlation | 0.149 | 1 | 0.075 | 0.070 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.217 | 0.536 | 0.563 | ||
N | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | |
N | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | |
| |||||
Resected gastric volume (mL) | Pearson correlation | 0.167 | 0.075 | 1 | -0.172 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.16S | 0.536 | 0.156 | ||
N | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | |
| |||||
BMI (1 year) | Pearson correlation | -0.872(∗∗) | 0.070 | -0.172 | 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.563 | 0.156 | ||
N | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). ∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).