Table 3. .
MRIs’ techniques | Histopathological stages | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Stage I | Stage II | Stage IV | ||
T1W-MRI Stage I Stage II Stage IV |
20 (62.5%) 12 (37.5%) 0 |
4 (33.3%) 8 (66.7%) 0 |
2 (33.3%) 0 4 (66.7%) |
<0.001 |
Degree of agreement | 0.41 (moderate agreement) | |||
T2W-MRI Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV |
28 (87.5%) 4 (12.5%) 0 0 |
4 (33.3%) 4 (33.3%) 4 (33.3%) 0 |
0 0 0 6 (100%) |
<0.001 |
Degree of agreement | 0.75 (good agreement) | |||
DW-MRI Stage I Stage II Stage IV |
32 (100%) 0 0 |
4 (33.3%) 8 (66.7%) 0 |
0 0 6 (100%) |
<0.001 |
Degree of agreement | 0.40 (moderate agreement) | |||
DCE-MRI Stage I Stage II Stage III |
28 (87.5%) 4 (12.5%) 0 |
4 (33.3%) 8 (66.7%) 0 |
2 (33.3%) 0 4 (66.7%) |
<0.001 |
Degree of agreement | 0.80 (very good agreement) | |||
Multiparametric MRI Stage I Stage II Stage IV |
28 (87.5%) 4 (12.5%) 0 |
4 (33.3%) 8 (66.7%) 0 |
0 0 6 (100%) |
<0.001 |
Degree of agreement | 0.87 (very good agreement) |
DCE, dynamic contrast enhanced.
Data were expressed in form of frequency (percentage). p-value was significant if <0.05.