Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;19(1):511–518. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8245

Table II.

Comparison of the variables measured at different time-points.

Parameters TEAS group (n=41) Control group (n=39)
MAP (mmHg)
  T0 89.7±7.9 90.7±10.6
  T1 86.2±9.6 86.2±10.8
  T2 83.1±10.9 86.2±10.7
  T3 86.2±10.1 86.1±10.1
HR (beats/min)
  T0 76.1±10.7 74.7±12.7
  T1 74.2±10.8 69.4±11.7
  T2 69.8±9.7 70.1±11.2
  T3 73.7±10.5 78.3±9.8
SpO2
  T0 99.4±0.6 99.5±0.5
  T1 99.6±0.6 99.5±0.7
  T2 99.6±0.5 99.5±0.9
  T3 99.7±0.8 99.6±0.9
pH
  T0 7.4±0.04 7.4±0.06
  T1 7.3±0.06 7.3±0.04
  T2 7.3±0.06 7.3±0.03
  T3 7.4±0.03 7.4±0.04
PCO2 (mmHg)
  T0 42.8±6.1 44.4±6.8
  T1 44.4±8.8 45.0±8.1
  T2 42.1±8.1 45.2±7.6
  T3 39.5±4.9 39.9±5.9
OI
  T0 425.6±21.2 423.2±22.0
  T1 450.5±30.0 442.3±28.9
  T2 491.6±37.8a 460.1±39.3
  T3 423.7±25.3a 395.0±31.5

Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.

a

P<0.05 compared with the patients in the Control group. TEAS, transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation; MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; OI, oxygen index; PCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; T0, time-point of arriving at the operating room; T1, time-point immediately prior to inducing the pneumoperitoneum; T2, time-point immediately after the end of pneumoperitoneum; T3, on leaving the operating room.