Table 5.
Predicted failure and efficiency rates of the Wells score and D-dimer testing for excluding DVT and PE in cancer patients
Reference | Cancer patients | All patients |
---|---|---|
Geersing et al12 (DVT) | ||
N | 834 | 10 002 |
Failure rate, % (95% CI) | 2.2 (0.5-8.6) | 1.2 (0.7-1.8) |
Efficiency, % (95% CI) | 9.1 (5.5-14.7) | 28.9 (20.3-39.5) |
van Es et al13 (PE) | ||
N | 938 | 7 268 |
Failure rate fixed D-dimer*, % (95% CI) | 2.6 (0.57-11.0) | 0.65 (0.38-1.11) |
Efficiency fixed D-dimer*, % (95% CI) | 9.1 (6.8-12.0) | 28.0 (20.5-37.0) |
Failure rate age-adjusted D-dimer†, % (95% CI) | 1.4 (0.15-12.6) | 0.94 (0.58-1.5) |
Efficiency age-adjusted D-dimer†, % (95% CI) | 13.1 (10.6-16.1) | 32.6 (24.6-41.7) |
Failure rate is defined as the probability of DVT or PE in those with an unlikely Wells score and a negative D-dimer result. Efficiency rate ia defined as the proportion of patients with an unlikely Wells score and a negative D-dimer result.
D-dimer threshold = 500 µg/L.
D-dimer threshold = age of patient multiplied by 10 µg/L in patients older than age 50 y.