Table 4.
Goodness of fit and comparative indices of the proposed and alternative measurement models (Study 2).
| Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | SRMR | RMSEA | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six-factor | 188.07 | 89 | 2.11 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.05 | 0.07* | 282.07 |
| Five-factor | 270.20 | 94 | 2.87 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 354.20 |
| Four-factor | 533.30 | 98 | 5.44 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 609.30 |
| Three-factor | 688.00 | 101 | 6.81 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 758.00 |
| Two-factor | 763.43 | 103 | 7.41 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 829.43 |
| One-factor | 882.77 | 104 | 8.48 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 946.78 |
χ2 values are at p < 0.001; RMSEA values are at pclose < 0.001 except *pclose = 0.007. All the chi-square differences against the baseline six-factor model are significant at p < 0.001.