Table 6.
Goodness of fit and comparative indices of the proposed and alternative models (Study 2).
| Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | SRMR | RMSEA | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 245.23 | 95 | 2.58 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 327.23 |
| Model 2 | 307.40 | 96 | 3.20 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 387.40 |
| Model 3 | 225.99 | 93 | 2.43 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 311.99 |
| Model 4 | 229.16 | 94 | 2.44 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 313.16 |
| Model 5 | 307.40 | 96 | 3.20 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 387.40 |
RMSEA values are at pclose < 0.001. All the chi-square differences among the four models are significant at p < 0.001, except for the difference between Models 3 and 4 (Δχ2 = 3.17, df = 1, p = 0.07).