Table 2.
Results of the sensitivity analyses.
| Result | Mean number of incremental pregnancies | Mean incremental societal costs, € | Mean ICERa societal perspective (95%CI), € | |
| Main analysisb | 86 | –270,000 | –3050 (–3960 to –540) | |
| Sensitivity analyses | ||||
|
|
85% intervention compliance | 105 | –340,200 | –3210 (–3960 to –1630) |
|
|
55% intervention compliance | 63 | –192,000 | –2840 (–3920 to –120) |
|
|
45% increase in pregnancy rate (0.477) | 64 | –186,300 | –3070 (–5610 to 1620) |
|
|
25% increase in pregnancy rate (0.411) | 40 | –98,300 | –2300 (–9610 to 9520) |
|
|
70% intervention coverage | 62 | –187,600 | –2840 (–3930 to –540) |
|
|
85% intervention coverage |
74 | –227,400 | –2850 (–3900 to –710) |
|
|
Worst-case scenarioc | 21 | –37,300 | –1270 (–20,900 to 13,200) |
|
|
Best-case scenariod | 123 | –408,900 | –3600 (–3900 to –1850) |
aICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
b100% intervention coverage, 70% intervention compliance, 65% increase in pregnancy rate.
c70% intervention coverage, 55% intervention compliance, 25% increase in pregnancy rate.
d100% intervention coverage, 100% intervention compliance, 65% increase in pregnancy rate.