Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2016 Nov 21;169:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.11.026

Table 2.

Candidate gene array.

Gene name EP DP ap-Value Ex + DP bp-Value cF-test

Atm 1.0 ± 0.0 2.2 ± 0.2 <0.01 2.3 ± 1.0 0.81 0.06
Cdkn1c 1.0 ± 0.0 1.8 ± 0.6 0.11 4.0 ± 1.7 0.09 0.03
Foxa1 1.0 ± 0.0 10.5 ± 3.9 0.02 9.1 ± 0.9 0.66 0.01
Krt18 1.0 ± 0.0 1.4 ± 0.1 <0.01 1.4 ± 0.7 0.93 0.46
Krt8 1.0 ± 0.0 1.8 ± 0.1 <0.01 1.7 ± 0.6 0.82 0.05
Mmp2 1.0 ± 0.0 1.6 ± 0.1 0.01 1.7 ± 1.5 0.92 0.62
Plau 1.0 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.5 0.87 0.3 ± 0.2 0.11 0.06

A hypothesis generating targeted gene array was run on RNA pooled from 3 animals per reaction (n = 3) mean ± SD.

a

EP vs. DP comparison.

b

DP vs. Ex + DP comparison.

c

Global F-test.