Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 10;21(10):e14037. doi: 10.2196/14037

Table 4.

Therapists attitude and treatment outcome (data of all 20 therapists who completed the questionnaires provided and of whom, 5 had not treated a chronic fatigue syndrome patient during the study).

Variable All therapists Therapists Statistical difference between therapists with high and low median


With high median With low median t P value
Patients treateda, n (%) 100 (87) 57 (48) 43 (39) b
Change score in fatigue severity, mean 12.7 15.7 9.0 2.42 .02
Attitude eHealthc, mean (SD)

Possibilities of eHealth scale (range 9-45) 28.0 (2.6) 28.6 (2.5) 25.8 (2.5) −2.05 .06

eHealth Negative Effect Scale (range 7-35) 25.2 (5.9) 25.6 (6.3) 26.8 (4.6) 0.38 .71

Computer Competence Scale (range 2-10) 8.1 (1.7) 8.7 (1.3) 7.0 (1.4) −2.28 .04
Attitude manualized treatment, mean (SD)

Positive outcome (range 0-35) 24.9 (4.1) 24.8 (4.7) 24.8 (4.1) 0.00 >.99

Negative process (range 0-50) 14.6 (7.4) 14.9 (8.1) 13.8 (7.4) −0.25 .80

aNumber of patients with complete data.

bNot applicable.

ceHealth: electronic health.