Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2019 Sep 26;57(5):592–600. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.06.013

Table 2.

Outcome Differences Between Intervention (n=53 Classrooms, 1,101 Students) and Comparison Conditions (n=54 Classrooms, 1,156 Students)

Pre-test Post-test

Outcome Intervention mean, % at risk (95% CI) Comparison mean, % at risk (95% CI) p-value Intervention mean, % at risk (95% CI) Comparison mean, % at risk (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI)
Continuous tobacco susceptibility 1.57 (1.54, 1.60) 1.56 (1.53, 1.59) 0.76 1.53 (1.50, 1.57) 1.63 (1.60, 1.66) <0.001 NA
Dichotomous tobacco susceptibility, % 17 (14, 19) 14 (11, 17) 0.17 12 (9, 14) 17 (14, 20) 0.003 0.63 (0.46, 0.86)
Normative beliefs, % 25 (22, 29) 26 (22, 30) 0.82 25 (21, 29) 28 (24, 32) 0.31 0.85 (0.63, 1.16)
Outcome expectations, % 20 (17, 23) 18 (15, 21) 0.25 19 (16, 21) 25 (22, 28) 0.002 0.69 (0.55, 0.87)
Knowledge, % 27 (24, 30) 30 (26, 33) 0.27 24 (20, 27) 31 (28, 35) 0.002 0.67 (0.53, 0.86)
Intentions, % 14 (11, 17) 11 (9, 14) 0.17 11 (9, 13) 16 (13, 18) 0.006 0.68 (0.51, 0.89)

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05)

NA, not applicable.