Table 1.
Comparison of the mean CWT with the baseline ADR and study ADR for each endoscopist
| Group A (gastroenterologists) |
Group B (colorectal surgeons) |
Group C (trainee endoscopists) |
|||||||||
| Code | Mean CWT (min) | Baseline ADR (%) | Study ADR (%) | Code | Mean CWT (min) | Baseline ADR (%) | Study ADR (%) | Code | Mean CWT (min) | Baseline ADR (%) | Study ADR (%) |
| 11 | 10.4 | 31.6 | 20.5 | 1 | 5.0 | 26.7 | 15.8 | 26 | 9.4 | 19.9 | 9.7 |
| 12 | 9.0 | 47.1 | 20.6 | 2 | 5.7 | 37.0 | 15.4 | 27 | 11.2 | 22.2 | 10.0 |
| 13 | 8.8 | 32.1 | 43.5 | 3 | 5.6 | 21.6 | 6.3 | 28 | 10.0 | 37.7 | 34.8 |
| 14 | 5.0 | 32.0 | 33.4 | 4 | 6.8 | 23.0 | 18.1 | 29 | 20.0 | NA | 25.0 |
| 15 | 6.8 | 19.5 | 16.7 | 5 | 6.1 | 23.0 | 18.4 | 30 | 9.0 | 31.9 | 25.0 |
| 16 | NA | 34.2 | 45.0 | 6 | 3.5 | 22.4 | 22.8 | 31 | 6.3 | 24.0 | 20.0 |
| 17 | 8.5 | 14.8 | 22.3 | 7 | 5.4 | 19.6 | 21.7 | 32 | 9.7 | 31.8 | 11.1 |
| 18 | 7.6 | 27.9 | 18.2 | 8 | 3.0 | 25.8 | 22.2 | 33 | 10.5 | 24.7 | 25.0 |
| 19 | 9.6 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 9 | 4.0 | 17.2 | 11.1 | 34 | 10.0 | 21.0 | 20.0 |
| 20 | 9.6 | 44.6 | 27.3 | 10 | 7.0 | 41.7 | 33.3 | 35 | 11.5 | 16.7 | 21.0 |
| 21 | 11.8 | 45.0 | 20.2 | 36 | 10.3 | 41.0 | 45.0 | ||||
| 22 | 10.7 | 36.2 | 21.7 | 37 | 8.4 | 14.5 | 45.0 | ||||
| 23 | 7.5 | 33.5 | 20.5 | 38 | 9.5 | 45.0 | 25.0 | ||||
| 24 | 4.0 | 22.0 | 33.3 | 39 | 15.0 | 40.0 | 25.0 | ||||
| 25 | 10.6 | 22.7 | 39.5 | ||||||||
ADR, adenoma detection rate; CWT, colonoscopy withdrawal time;NA, not available.