Table 1.
List of criteria used to assess methodological quality and average score across studies.
| Item | Criteria | Meana |
| 1 | Explicit theoretical framework | 1.5 |
| 2 | Statement of aims/objectives in main body of report | 3.0 |
| 3 | Clear description of research setting | 2.1 |
| 4 | Evidence of sample size considered in terms of analysis | 1.5 |
| 5 | Representative sample of target group of a reasonable size | 1.3 |
| 6 | Description of procedure for data collection | 2.2 |
| 7 | Rationale for choice of data collection tool(s) | 1.8 |
| 8 | Detailed recruitment data | 2.2 |
| 9 | Statistical assessment of reliability and validity of measurement tool(s) (quantitative only) | 1.5 |
| 10 | Fit between stated research question and method of data collection (quantitative only) | 2.5 |
| 11 | Fit between stated research question and format and content of data collection tool, for example, interview schedule (qualitative only) | 1.9 |
| 12 | Fit between research question and method of analysis (quantitative only) | 2.5 |
| 13 | Good justification for analytic method selected | 1.2 |
| 14 | Assessment of reliability of analytic process (qualitative only) | 0 |
| 15 | Evidence of user involvement in design | 0.4 |
| 16 | Strengths and limitations critically discussed | 2.2 |
aScores can range from 0 (not at all) to 3 (complete).