Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 1;2019:6298128. doi: 10.1155/2019/6298128

Table 2.

Liver uptake of [18F]FtRGD in mice fed with CDAHDF, HFD, and standard diet-fed mice (n = 5 per group). All data are presented as mean ± SD, and statistical significance is shown as p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

Days Standard diet
%ID/g ± SD
High fat diet
%ID/g ± SD
CDAHFD
%ID/g ± SD
21 0.52 ± 0.13 0.50 ± 0.19 0.64 ± 0.11
28 0.54 ± 0.16 0.62 ± 0.18 0.72 ± 0.19
35 0.46 ± 0.11$ 0.56 ± 0.13 0.70 ± 0.10
42 0.57 ± 0.09$ 0.60 ± 0.16 0.74 ± 0.11
49 0.47 ± 0.11$$ 0.52 ± 0.08 0.84 ± 0.11∗∗
56 0.53 ± 0.09$$ 0.52 ± 0.08 0.90 ± 0.10
63 0.48 ± 0.14$$ 0.48 ± 0.11 0.88 ± 0.13∗∗
72 0.57 ± 0.10$$ 0.51 ± 0.09 0.96 ± 0.15