Table 4.
Association between smoking status and cardiometabolic risk factors in different models of logistic regression analysis
| Passive smoker | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | P value | ||
| Overweight | Model I | 1.13 | 1.01–1.27 | 0.04 |
| Model II | 1.21 | 1.06–1.37 | 0.004 | |
| General obesity | Model I | 0.92 | 0.83–1.03 | 0.15 |
| Model II | 0.90 | 0.80–1.02 | 0.09 | |
| Abdominal obesity | Model I | 0.97 | 0.89–1.05 | 0.44 |
| Model II | 1.00 | 0.91–1.1 | 0.97 | |
| Elevated LDL-C | Model I | 0.96 | 0.80–1.14 | 0.62 |
| Model II | 0.95 | 0.78–1.14 | 0.57 | |
| Model III | 0.95 | 0.78–1.15 | 0.57 | |
| Elevated TC | Model I | 0.99 | 0.73–1.35 | 0.95 |
| Model II | 0.97 | 0.69–1.35 | 0.84 | |
| Model III | 0.98 | 0.70–1.37 | 0.89 | |
| Elevated TG | Model I | 1.12 | 0.97–1.29 | 0.14 |
| Model II | 1.18 | 1.00–1.38 | 0.05 | |
| Model III | 1.17 | 0.99–1.37 | 0.06 | |
| Low HDL-C | Model I | 1.06 | 0.92–1.23 | 0.41 |
| Model II | 1.02 | 0.87–1.20 | 0.80 | |
| Model III | 1.01 | 0.86–1.19 | 0.90 | |
| Elevated FBG | Model I | 1.30 | 0.94–1.80 | 0.12 |
| Model II | 1.16 | 0.82–1.65 | 0.41 | |
| Model III | 1.14 | 0.80–1.62 | 0.46 | |
| Elevated BP | Model I | 1.05 | 0.94–1.17 | 0.41 |
| Model II | 1.06 | 0.94–1.19 | 0.35 | |
| Model III | 1.06 | 0.94–1.20 | 0.32 | |
| MetS (+) | Model I | 1.54 | 1.14–2.07 | 0.005 |
| Model II | 1.62 | 1.17–2.25 | 0.004 | |
| Model III | 1.63 | 1.17–2.29 | 0.004 | |
Model I: crude model; Model II: adjusted for age, sex, living area, SES, physical activity, screen time, positive family history of chronic diseases; Model III: additionally adjusted for BMI in all abnormality except the weight disorders