Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 30;18(2):705–716. doi: 10.1007/s40200-019-00434-x

Table 2.

Data extracted from eligible RCTs in qualitative systematic review

Study Design Subjects/ sample size Age (yr) Sex Supplement Duration (month) Dosage Indicator Main results Quality Score
Bo-Jie Hu et al. 2011 [29] Quasi-Experimental

Total 90

(30 healthy, 30 non-PDR with treatment, 30 non-PDR non-treatment)

59 M/F lutein + zeaxanthin 3 6 mg + 0.5 mg BCVA, CS, OCT

After medication:

-Improvement of VA

-↑Sig CS

-↓Sig Foveal thickness

3
Garcia-Medina et al. 2011 [30] RCT

Total 105

(62 T2DM with non-PDR with treatment, 43 T2DM with non-PDR without treatment)

30–65 M/F Mixture: 60 2tablets/day

MDA,

TAS,

aBCVA,

DR score

-↓Sig MDA in both groups

-↓Sig TAS in placebo and ↑NS in treatment group

-NS change in aBCVA

-↑Sig DR score in placebo and ↑NS in treatment group

3
VC, 60 mg
Alpha-Tocopherol 10 mg
Niacin 10 mg
b-Carotene 3 mg
Lutein, 3 mg
Zn 13.5 mg
Cu 1 mg
Se 10 mcg
Manganese 1 mg
Proteins 130 mg
CH 60 mg
Fat 230 mg
Nebbioso et al. 2012 [31] RCT

Total 32

(16 pre-DR in treatment, 16 pre-DR in placebo)

57 M/F

Mixure:

ALA,

genistein,

VC,VE,

B complex

1 400 + 80 + 30 + 5 + 15 mg

FORT,

d-ROM

BAP

-↑Sig. BAP by treatment

-↑Sig. OP by treatment

3
Domanico et al. 2015 [32] RCT

Total 68

(34 Non-PDR with/without supplements)

40–79 M/F

A mixture:

Pycnogenol,

Coenzyme Q10, VE

6

1 tablet/ day

(50+ 20+ 30 mg)

CMT

FORT

-↑NS BCVA in both groups

-↓Sig. FORT at 3 mo, ↓NS at 6 mo treatment

-↓Sig. CMT at 3 mo, ↓NS at 6 mo treatment

-NS correlation between FORT and CMT

2
Roig Revert et al. 2015 [33]

RCT

(Community-Based Study Design)

Total 208 (68T2DM with DR, 62 T2DM without DR, 78 healthy) 25–80 M/F

Mixture:

DHA, vitamins E, C, B1, B2, B3, B6, B9, B12, lutein, zeaxanthin, glutathione, hydroxytyrosol, Se, Mn, Zn, Cu

18 Not clear

MDA,

TAS,

HbA1C, BS, lipid profile, BCVA, retinal thickness, IOP

At baseline:

-↑Sig. Oxidative stress,inflammatory, vascular risk markers in T2DM + DR vs. others

-↓Sig.TAS in T2DM + DR vs. others

After treatment:

-↓Sig MDA in T2DM+ DR

-↑Sig TAS in T2DM + DR

-↑Sig HbA1C in T2DM + DR

-NS changes in lipid profile in T2DM ± DR

-↓NS BCVA

-↓NS IOP in T2DM + DR

-↑Sig IOP in T2DM-DR

-↑Sig RNFL in T2DM ± DR

-↑NS MT in T2DM+ DR

-↓NS MT in T2DM- DR

2
Rodríguez-Carrizalez et al. 2016 [34] RCT

Total 60

(20 Non-PDR in each group)

60 M/F

Group 1:

Coenzyme Q10

6 400 mg

HbA1c,

FBS, Lipid profile,

LPO,

Nitrites/ Nitrates,

TAC, CAT, GPX, CVA, LEP

-↓NS HbA1C, FBS, Tchol, LDL, TG by treatment

-↑NS HDL by treatment

-↓Sig. LPO, Nitrites/ Nitrates, CAT, GPx by treatment

-↑Sig. TAC by treatment

-NS change in CVA in all groups

-NS decraese in LEP in all groups

2

Group 2:

Mixture of lutein, astaxanthin, zeaxanthin,VC,VE,

Zn, Cu

10 + 4 + 1 + 180 + 30 + 20 + 1 mg
Group 3: placebo
Chatziralli et al. 2017 [35] Quasi-experimental

Total 282

(282 Insulin-dependent T2DM + DR in different stages)

50–70 M/F VE 3 300 mg MDA, DR degree, HbA1C

-↓Sig. MDA

in all DR stages

-↑Sig response to VE in PDR by treatment naïve vs. prior laser photocoagulation

0

CMT Central macular thickness, FORT Free oxygen radical test, MDA Malondialdehyde, TAS Total antioxidant status, aBCVA Average best corrected visual acuity (average of both eyes of each patient on a decimal scale), LPO Lipo-peroxidation products, NS Non significant, d-ROM reactive oxygen metabolites, BAP Biological antioxidant potential, OP oscillatory potential, CS Contrast sensitivity, OCT optical coherence tomography, PDR proliferative diabetic retinopathy, MT Macular thickness, IOP Intraocular pressure, RNFL Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, CAT Catalase, TAC total antioxidant capacity, LEP Left eye pressure, CVA Corrected visual acuity, CH Carbohydrate