Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;8(11):590. doi: 10.3390/foods8110590

Table 3.

Magnitude range analysis of orthogonal design.

F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9
Polysaccharides (mg/g dry substrate)
k1 32.375 33.947 36.732 30.823 34.584 35.053 32.729 34.696 32.984
k2 29.211 33.753 32.208 29.181 32.605 31.872 31.090 29.526 34.635
k3 29.865 27.338 26.665 32.881 26.790 27.678 32.805 33.805 28.629
k4 32.732 29.144 28.578 31.299 30.205 29.581 27.559 26.156 27.935
R 3.521 6.609 10.067 3.7 7.794 7.375 5.246 8.54 6.7
DPPH (%)
k1 74.3 75.0 85.0 83.6 83.9 83.9 84.3 83.2 81.1
k2 82.7 82.9 83.1 83.7 83.0 83.5 83.6 81.4 82.9
k3 87.9 85.7 80.2 83.3 80.5 83.8 85.5 86.4 84.0
k4 88.4 89.6 85.0 82.6 85.8 82.1 79.9 82.4 85.3
R 14.1 14.6 4.8 1.1 5.3 1.8 5.6 5 4.2

Note: F1: fructose, F2: glycerin, F3: peptone, F4: MgCl2, F5: VB1, F6: VB2, F7: water–materials ratio, F8: CaCl2, F9: corn bran; K1, K2, K3, and K4 were the average values of Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, and Level 4 for each factor.