Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;2019(12):CD013505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013505

Boudhraa 2010.

Methods RCT
Setting: Tunisia
Method of randomisation: not stated*
Blinding: unblinded
Number randomised: 63
Participants Summary: metformin vs CC in PCOS non‐obese women
Inclusion criteria: unclear. ?diagnostic criteria of PCOS used
Exclusion criteria: male factor infertility, tubal disease
Baseline characteristics of each group: metformin vs CC
  • mean age: 30.55, 30.72

  • mean BMI: 29.9, 29.7


Dropouts: none
Interventions Main intervention: metformin 850 mg/d, CC 100 mg for 5 days
Duration: not stated
Co‐interventions: recommendations on healthy diet
Outcomes Primary: live birth rate
Secondary: clinical pregnancy, ovulation: method to confirm ovulation not stated, BMI
Notes *Study protocol is too brief. Inadequate information to assess the quality of the study. No reply from study author
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Inadequate information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Inadequate information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Inadequate information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Inadequate information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Inadequate information
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Inadequate information
Other bias Low risk No evidence of other bias however, limited reported methodology