Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;19:463. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1894-2

Table 5.

Change in self-efficacy for all sessions combined, where 0 = “not at all”, 1 = “a little”, 2 = “moderately”, 3 = “a lot” and 4 = “totally” confident

Question Mean Pre Score Mean Post Score Post scores  ≥ 3 Mean Difference P-Value Negative Ranks Positive Ranks Ties Total
Q1 1.55 ± 0.59 2.45 ± 0.63 196 (44.6%) 0.90 <  0.001 3 (0.7%) 334 (76.1%) 102 (23.2%) 439
Q2 1.48 ± 0.61 2.41 ± 0.65 192 (43.8%) 0.93 <  0.001 5 (1.1%) 330 (75.3%) 103 (23.5%) 438
Q3 1.68 ± 0.64 2.58 ± 0.62 240 (54.9%) 0.90 <  0.001 4 (0.9%) 319 (73%) 114 (26.1%) 437
Q4 1.99 ± 0.71 2.76 ± 0.69 293 (66.7%) 0.77 <  0.001 10 (2.3%) 282 (64.2%) 147 (33.5%) 439
Q5 1.65 ± 0.64 2.48 ± 0.63 195 (44.7%) 0.83 <  0.001 4 (0.9%) 306 (70.2%) 126 (28.9%) 436
Q6 1.57 ± 0.65 2.46 ± 0.68 204 (46.5%) 0.89 <  0.001 7 (1.6%) 320 (72.9%) 112 (25.5%) 439
Q7 1.91 ± 0.72 2.72 ± 0.66 277 (63.1%) 0.81 <  0.001 5 (1.1%) 294 (67%) 140 (31.9%) 439