Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;19:558. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2184-1

Table 1.

The morphological traits of L. chinensis and the soil characteristics in the plots with different grazing intensities

Parameter Control LG MG HG
Specific leaf area (cm2 g− 1) 116.1 ± 2.6b 143.4 ± 3.7a 100.6 ± 4.1c 118.8 ± 6.9b
Tiller number 3.4 ± 0.5b 4.0 ± 0.4ab 4.2 ± 0.4ab 5.3 ± 0.3a
Mean internode length (cm) 6.1 ± 0.1a 5.4 ± 0.3b 2.4 ± 0.2c 2.4 ± 0.2c
Plant height (cm) 26.3 ± 0.8a 24.6 ± 1.1a 20.4 ± 0.7a 13.2 ± 1.6b
Plant biomass (g m−2) 35.1 ± 1.7a 31.3 ± 2.0ab 27.6 ± 2.4b 15.2 ± 1.0c
Leaf osmotic potential (MPa) −1.6 ± 0.04a −1.9 ± 0.19ab −3.0 ± 0.04b −2.8 ± 0.92b
Soil water content (%) 5.77 ± 0.93c 7.60 ± 0.08b 8.95 ± 0.11a 4.53 ± 0.08d
Soil nitrogen content (%) 0.15 ± 0.003b 0.17 ± 0.003a 0.16 ± 0.001a 0.14 ± 0.003c
Soil carbon content (%) 1.47 ± 0.018c 1.64 ± 0.005a 1.54 ± 0.015b 1.37 ± 0.006d
Soil available phosphorus (%) 405.6 ± 0.66a 389.0 ± 6.22b 390.2 ± 3.29b 358.8 ± 1.57c

Values are means ± SE. Values in a column labeled with different letters differ significantly (ANOVA followed by LSD test, P < 0.05)

Control no grazing, LG light grazing, MG medium grazing, HG heavy grazing