Table 3.

Mixed effects model predicting compliance with ≥4 cystoscopies, ≥4 cytologies, and ≥6 BCG treatments

	Univariable			Multivariable
Covariates	Odds Ratio	95% CI	P Value	Odds Ratio	95% CI	P Value
Age group, y
66–69	1.00			1.00
70–74	1.05	0.60, 1.83	.87	1.02	0.59, 1.79	.93
75–79	0.63	0.34, 1.18	.15	0.57	0.31, 1.03	.06
80+	0.51	0.26, 1.03	.06	0.53	0.28, 1.02	.06
Gender
Male	1.00
Female	0.78	0.49, 1.24	.30
Marital status
Married	1.00			1.00
Other	0.83	0.59, 1.16	.28	0.87	0.59, 1.28	.48
Metro county
Metro	1.00
Nonmetro	1.27	0.84, 1.92	.25
Charlson score
0	1.00			1.00
1	0.88	0.60, 1.30	.53	0.94	0.66, 1.34	.73
2	1.48	0.93, 2.35	.10	1.58	0.95, 2.63	.08
≥3	1.07	0.53, 2.14	.85	1.14	0.58, 2.25	.70
Percent of subjects in zip code aged 25+ with ≥4 y of college education
<15%	1.00
15%–25%	1.06	0.70, 1.62	.78
25%–35%	1.17	0.62, 2.21	.62
>35%	0.78	0.52, 1.16	.22
Median zip code household income
<$35,000	1.00
$35,000-$45,000	1.37	0.92, 2.05	.12
$45,000-$55,000	1.09	0.62, 1.93	.76
>$55,000	1.21	0.46, 3.21	.70
Year of diagnosis
1992–1997	1.00			1.00
1998–2002	1.42	0.69, 2.92	.34	1.25	0.61, 2.54	.54
2003–2009	1.26	0.65, 2.44	.49	1.32	0.73, 2.38	.36
Institution type
Nonacademic noncancer center	1.00			1.00
Academic noncancer center	0.92	0.44, 1.92	.83	0.93	0.44, 1.96	0.86
Academic cancer center	9.31	5.60, 15.49	<.01	11.68	7.07, 19.29	<.01
Unknown	0.48	0.11, 2.07	.32	0.50	0.12, 2.01	.33
Grade
Poorly differentiated	1.00
Undifferentiated	1.26	0.80, 1.99	.31
Classification
Ta	1.00			1.00
T1	1.28	0.89, 1.83	.18	1.26	0.88, 1.79	.21
Tis	3.00	1.81, 4.99	<.01	3.24	1.86, 5.63	<.01

Bold values denotes statistical significance.