Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;67(12):2650–2657. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16149

Table 1.

Summary of current literature on prediction of recovery potential

  • A total of 26 of 27 studies addressed the recovery of function after functional decline, most often measured with questionnaires before and after the stressor, but they varied in study design.

  • The stressors studied were elective surgery, hip/femur fracture, any acute disease or injury requiring hospital admission, cancer/chemotherapy, or unspecified.

  • All studies operationalized resilience using a definition‐driven approach.11 Recovery was typically dichotomized (yes/no), with a large variety of definitions.

  • Reported predictors of recovery were functional status, cognition, nutritional status, frailty or multimorbidity, hand grip strength, social support, and depressive symptoms.

  • Three studies collected daily in‐hospital questionnaires about mobility23, 24 or daily step counts with wearable technology,25 providing more detailed information about the course of recovery.

  • One study combined up to 296 patient characteristics derived from health record data in a machine‐learning modeling approach and showed that this method can predict with a reasonable accuracy whether recovery of functional status after hospitalization is to be expected.59