Table 2.
The Association of Sodium Density with Dynapenia
| Crude | Model1 | Model2 | Model3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | |
| Total study population | ||||||||
| Sodium density (mg/1000 kcal) | ||||||||
| Q1 (−1177.94) | 1.53 | (1.25–1.86) | 1.25 | (1.00–1.55) | 1.16 | (0.90–1.51) | 1.03 | (0.79–1.35) |
| Q2 (1177.94–1675.48) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Q3 (1675.48–2356.22) | 1.12 | (0.92–1.36) | 1.13 | (0.93–1.37) | 1.13 | (0.90–1.42) | 1.12 | (0.89–1.41) |
| Q4 (2356.22-) | 1.28 | (1.04–1.58) | 1.45 | (1.16–1.81) | 1.40 | (1.08–1.82) | 1.39 | (1.07–1.80) |
| Men | ||||||||
| Sodium density (mg/1000 kcal) | ||||||||
| Q1 (−1253.18) | 1.61 | (1.13–2.29) | 1.55 | (1.07–2.25) | 1.16 | (0.71–1.90) | 1.08 | (0.68–1.72) |
| Q2 (1253.18–1741.89) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Q3 (1741.89–2401.55) | 1.29 | (0.92–1.79) | 1.25 | (0.87–1.78) | 1.28 | (0.85–1.94) | 0.99 | (0.68–1.43) |
| Q4 (2401.55-) | 1.15 | (0.79–1.66) | 1.12 | (0.77–1.64) | 1.06 | (0.68–1.66) | 1.15 | (0.71–1.86) |
| Women | ||||||||
| Sodium density (mg/1000 kcal) | ||||||||
| Q1 (−1113.99) | 1.47 | (1.16–1.87) | 1.40 | (1.08–1.83) | 1.63 | (1.18–2.25) | 1.01 | (0.74–1.38) |
| Q2 (1113.99–1610.93) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Q3 (1610.93–2260.40) | 1.04 | (0.82–1.33) | 1.10 | (0.86–1.40) | 1.24 | (0.93–1.65) | 1.18 | (0.89–1.58) |
| Q4 (2260.40-) | 1.62 | (1.26–2.09) | 1.95 | (1.47–2.57) | 1.98 | (1.43–2.74) | 1.51 | (1.10–2.07) |
Notes: Model1: age, BMI. Model2: age, BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, education, marital status. Model3: age, BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, education, marital status, Charlson comorbidity index, > 3kg of weight loss within past 1 year, protein intake, total energy intake, potassium intake, resistance exercise, aerobic exercise.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.