Table 5.
Results presented in articles
Article and PROM | Structural Validity | Internal Consistency | Cross-cultural validity | Reliability | Measurement Error | Construct Validity | Responsiveness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zelle et al. (2017) AAOS |
N/R | N/R | N/R | ICC or weighted kappa not reported | N/R |
AAOS-CS with SF-36-PCS r = 0.667 AAOS-CS with SF-36-MCS r = 0.506 AAOS-SCS with SF-36-PCS rs = 0.358 AAOS SCS with SF-36-MCS rs = 0.356 |
N/R |
McPhail et al. (2014) A-FORM | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Buker et al. (2017) OMAS | N/R | Cronbach’s Alpha 0.76 | N/R | ICC 0.98 | N/R | OMAS with 5 FAOS Subscales: pain r = 0.788, symptoms r = 0.753, ADL r = 0.798, sports r = 0.809, QoL r = 0.772 | N/R |
Garratt et al. (2018) OMAS | CFI 0.99 and TLI 0.98 | Cronbach’s Alpha 0.82 | N/R | ICC 0.92 | MIC not defined |
OMAS with SEFAS rs = 0.88 OMAS with SF-36-PCS rs = 0.77 OMAS with EQ-5D rs = 0.79 |
N/R |
Olerud and Molander (1984) OMAS | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Turhan et al. (2017) OMAS | N/R | Cronbach’s Alpha 0.84 | N/R | ICC 0.98 | MIC not defined |
OMAS with FAAM-ADL r = 0.86 OMAS with FAAM-S r = 0.83 OMAS with SF-12-PCS r = 0.72 OMAS with SF-12-MCS r = 0.60 |
N/R |
Key: r = Pearson’s correlation, rs = Spearman’s correlation, ADL = Activities of Daily Living, QoL = Quality of life, FAAM-ADL = FAAM Activities of Daily Living Subscale, FAAM-S – FAAM Sports Subscale, AAO-CS = AAOS Core Score, AAOS-SCS = AAOS Shoe Comfort Scale, PCS=Physical component Score, MCS = Mental component Score, EQ-5D = EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L Score, ICC=Intraclass correlation coefficient, TLI = Tucker Lewis index, CFI=Confirmatory Factor Analysis, MIC = Minimally Important Change