Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;9:19306. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55845-w

Table 8.

Comparison of fatty acid composition (mean ± SE) of adult hilsa (>800 g) from Hooghly and Padma river systems.

Fatty acid Specimens
Hooghly hilsa Padma hilsa
C14 6.00 ± 0.06 6.14 ± 0.10
C16 24.34 ± 0.19 23.88 ± 0.09
C18** 24.43b ± 0.61 15.33a ± 0.20
∑SFA** 54.77b±0.48 45.35a ± 0.20
C16:1** 7.17a ± 0.18 11.86b ± 0.20
C18:1** 13.82a ± 0.26 20.76b ± 0.55
C20:1** 1.56b ± 0.02 1.25a ± 0.02
C22:1** 0 0.14 ± 0.11
∑MUFA** 22.54a±0.45 33.86b ± 0.76
C18:2** 1.94b ± 0.01 1.79a ± 0.00
C20:2** 1.06b ± 0.01 0.87a ± 0.01
C20:4 2.29 ± 0.03 1.63 ± 0.20
C20:5 12.18 ± 0.005 11.78 ± 0.10
C22:6 5.25 ± 0.01 4.59 ± 0.74
∑PUFA 22.71 ± 0.04 20.66 ± 0.84
n-3 17.42 ± 0.02 16.37 ± 0.64
n-6* 5.28b ± 0.02 4.29a ± 0.20
n-3/n-6** 3.30a ± 0.01 3.82b ± 0.03

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Means followed by different superscripts in a row differ significantly from each other.