Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;9:19312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55714-6

Table 3.

Between condition analyses. Results of the binomial logistic regression models comparing the pooled data of the positive and negative condition for the eleven DogFACS variables.

DogFACS variable χ2 df Estimate SE z R2 CI P (Holm-Bonferroni corrected)
2.5% 97.5%
1. Inner brow raiser (AU101) 0.13 1 −0.13 0.36 −0.35 0.19 −0.86 0.57 0.723 (1.000)
2.Blink (AU145) 6.91 1 0.85 0.32 2.63 0.18 0.23 1.51 0.009 (0.051)
3. Lip corner puller (AU12) 1.82 1 0.67 0.50 1.35 0.52 −0.28 1.69 0.177 (0.797)
4. Lower lip depressor (AU116) 1.98 1 −0.70 0.50 −1.41 0.30 −1.70 0.28 0.159 (0.797)
5. Lips part (AU25) 10.61 1 1.60 0.49 3.26 0.63 0.69 2.64 0.001 (0.01)
6. Jaw drop (AU26) 12.58 1 1.68 0.47 3.55 0.59 0.80 2.67 <0.001(0.004)
7. Tongue show (AD19) 1.28 1 0.61 0.54 1.13 0.65 −0.42 1.72 0.257 (0.797)
8. Nose lick (AD137) 9.50 1 2.37 0.77 3.08 0.24 1.08 4.24 0.002 (0.014)
9. Ears adductor (EAD102) 10.34 1 −1.79 0.56 −3.22 0.08 −2.97 −0.75 0.001 (0.01)
10. Ears flattener (EAD103) 29.46 1 1.84 0.34 5.43 0.34 1.20 2.54 <0.001 (<0.001)
11. Panting (AD126) 0.43 1 0.32 0.49 0.65 0.53 −0.63 1.31 0.513 (1.000)

Variables with bold letters differed between the two conditions, based on the 95% confidence interval not containing zero.