Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2019 Dec 17;10:5746. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13758-2

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 9 — a Depiction of the general pathway that leads to ETI response. b List of A. thaliana plants used in this experiment. Fluorescence and brightfield imaging (×40 magnification) of epidermal peels applied with AEP (100 µM) for wild-type Col-0 c, R-protein-deficient rpm1rps2 d, and the ethylene biosynthesis-defected acs1/2/6/4/5/9/7/11 e. Additionally, supplementation studies were also performed using Pst AvrRpm1 or Pst AvrRpt2 (bacterial solution OD₆₀₀ = 0.02), which was applied to all plants. f Summary of the measured fluorescence between the various conditions studied. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. If not indicated, comparisons were made between the mutants and wild-type under the same treatment conditions. *P < 0.03, **P < 0.002, ***P < 0.0002, ****P < 0.0001, ns = not significant. Error is represented as s.d. of three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.