Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;7(1):439–448. doi: 10.1002/nop2.408

Table 4.

Intervention group (N = 24) and control group (N = 20) analyses before and after implementation

Scale and subscale

Intervention group

Baseline

Median (Q1‐Q3)

Intervention group

Follow‐up

Median (Q1‐Q3)

Changes after compared with before

p‐valuea

Control group Baseline

Median (Q1‐Q3)

Control group Follow‐up

Median (Q1‐Q3)

Changes after

compared with before

p‐valuea

P‐CAT
Extent of personalizing care (8−40 b) 24. 5 (17.5–30.8) 25.0 (18.0–32.0) 0.659 29.0 (22.0–31.0) 27.0 (22.2–29.8) 0.545
Amount of organizational and environmental support (5−25 b) 11.0 (6.5–16.5) 10.0 (6.5–15.8) 0.887 12.0 (7.2–15.0) 11.0 (10.0–16.0) 0.447
PCQ‐P
Safety (10−60 b) 55.0 (50.0–57.2) 51.5 (48.5–55.8) 0.018 56.0 (48.5–59.8) 53.0 (47.5–58.0) 0.878
Everydayness (4−24 b) 19.5 (17.0–23.0) 20.0 (18.0–23.0) 0.563 20.5 (18.0–23.0) 19.5 (18.0–22.0) 0.630
Hospitality (3−18 b) 15.0 (14.0–16.0) 16.0 (13.2–18.0) 0.368 16.0 (13.5–18.0) 15.5 (14.2–17.0) 0.959

Q1 = first quartile; Q3 = third quartile. Significant values are given in bold.

a

Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.

b

Underlined score is the most favourable score.