Table 1.
Author/Year | Design | Purpose/Aim | Setting/Sample | Intervention | Results and findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baron and Newman (2016) United Kingdom |
Randomized Controlled Trial | Investigated behavioural effects of mobile phone‐based telehealth | Adults (N = 81) with poorly controlled type 1 and type 2 diabetes | Compared mobile phone application and standard care |
Mobile phone application improved the management of diabetes and self‐care. Significantly improved self‐efficacy |
Bratzke (2015) | Narrative Review | Synthesize research findings related to self‐management |
Thirteen articles Majority qualitative Participants with multimorbidity |
Empirical studies addressed priority setting and decision‐making | Decisions based on personal preferences and values, barriers are prevalent and focused research needed |
Cameron et al. (2018) Canada |
Quantitative correlational | Evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in remote patients with chronic conditions |
Adults (N = 213) Rural and remote with chronic disease |
Chronic disease self‐management programme via teleconference | Patients need content delivered based on social identification provides for increased self‐efficacy |
Cottrell et al. (2017) | Systematic review and meta‐analysis | Evaluate the effectiveness of real‐time telerehabilitation | 13 studies met the criteria for methodological criteria |
Adults with a diagnosed musculoskeletal condition. Treatment intervention via real‐time telerehabilitation medium compared with face‐to‐face |
Telerehabilitation is effective in improving physical function, disability, and pain |
Cutler, Crawford, & Engleking (2018) | Systematic review | Evaluate outcomes of self‐management for adults with chronic conditions | Ten articles investigating the management of chronic conditions | Self‐management programmes provided through in‐person, group sessions | Improving self‐efficacy through self‐management can have a direct or indirect impact on behaviour change. Behaviours must be sustained to sustain change |
Devan et al. (2018) | Systematic review and meta‐synthesis | Synthesize enablers and barriers to self‐management |
33 studies (N = 512) Thematic analysis and confidence in evidence from reviews of qualitative research approach Patients with chronic pain |
Only included interventions that involved at least four self‐management skills for chronic pain | Providing intermittent support, peer support groups shared decision‐making and guided problem‐solving is essential to ongoing self‐management |
Fors et al. (2018) Sweden |
Quantitative Descriptive |
Evaluate the effects of person‐centred support via telephone | Adults (N = 221) with COPD and/or CHF measured general self‐efficacy, re‐hospitalization, and death | The intervention was person‐centred telephone support from educated RN with specific training after discharge. Control group received no additional care | Intervention reduced risk of decreased self‐efficacy and clinical events were not increased up to 6 months post‐discharge |
Fortin et al. (2019) Canada |
Descriptive Qualitative | Evaluate the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary care practices. Corroborate quantitative results |
Interviews with patients (N = 36), family members (N = 2), Focus groups (N = 7), healthcare professionals (N = 16) multimorbidity |
Chronic disease prevention and management programme by an interdisciplinary team integrated into existing self‐management programme | Increased awareness, knowledge, and increased motivation and empowerment. Positive impact on patients and family members. Negative effects were the loss of beneficial effects of intervention and support or resistance from family modulated effects |
Hardinge et al. (2015) United Kingdom |
Quantitative Descriptive |
Evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile telehealth application that allows patients to record data, communicate with healthcare professionals, and access educational materials | Participants in the mHealth intervention. Adults (N = 18) with moderate to severe COPD | COPD patients use mobile telehealth (mHealth) applications to monitor symptoms and use of education for the self‐initiated treatment of exacerbation | Daily use of mHealth platform was feasible and acceptable to users and was found to potentially identify exacerbations early |
Henselmans et al. (2014) Netherlands |
Quantitative Correlational |
Examine perceived efficacy and barriers in consultations and communication support | Diagnosed chronic disease 15 years or older (N = 1,314) | Completed the perceived efficacy in patient‐provider interaction scale, and questions related to barriers to participation and interest in communication support | Most felt efficacious during consultations, common barriers were ‘too little time’ and concern of being bothersome.’ Patients perceived the least barriers when seeing a nurse |
Hickman et al. (2015) United States |
Nonblinded randomized controlled trial | To report preliminary efficacy of a serious game for health (eSMART‐HD) to enhance blood pressure control among community‐dwelling adults with hypertension | Nonprobability sample of adults with hypertension (N = 116) | Participants assigned to the experimental group were exposed to screen‐based education focused on hypertension and self‐management strategies | Results confirmed the efficacy of eSMART‐HD as a strategy for hypertension self‐management and improving blood pressure control |
Horrell et al. (2017) United States District of Columbia Puerto Rico |
Quantitative | To compare enrolment and completion rates of middle‐aged Chronic Disease Self‐management Programme with different income levels and sociodemographics | Age 55–64 (N = 19,365) | Chronic Disease Self‐management Programme | Results found middle‐aged participants from the most impoverished counties were more likely to complete the programme |
Kennedy et al. (2017) Canada |
Quantitative Statistics | Compare two modes of delivery of a prescription for an education programme with arthritis patients. In‐person and remote | Adults with arthritis (N = 123) participated 36 were in‐person, and 87 were remote | One‐day telemedicine programme was adapted for two video conference workshops | Similar improvements in self‐efficacy and other outcomes for both groups |
Koch, Wakefield, & Wakefield (2015) | Systematic Literature Review (12 qualitative studies) | Locate and describe patient perceptions of barriers and facilitators to managing multiple chronic conditions | 13 peer‐reviewed articles that evaluated the burden of care in adults with two or more chronic diseases | N/A | 13 barriers and nine facilitators were found |
Lin et al. (2017) | Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled studies | Evaluated the effects of self‐management programmes in patients with chronic kidney diseases | Eighteen randomized controlled trials | Self‐management programme | Small effect on self‐management, medium effect on self‐efficacy, depression, and quality of life, large effect on anxiety |
Mackey et al. (2016) | Literature Review | Assess the association between health literacy and patient characteristics related to self‐management behaviours | Studies must use a valid health literacy tool, at least one self‐management behaviour assessed, and patients had a chronic condition (N = 31) | N/A | Low health literacy may affect behaviours, such as self‐efficacy, that are necessary for the development of self‐management skills |
Roncoroni et al. (2019) United States |
Quantitative Correlational |
Understand the role of health self‐efficacy as a precursor to health‐promoting behaviours and treatment adherence |
Rural adults (N = 273) Predominately low‐income and indigent rural patients |
Completed demographic data questionnaire, self‐rated abilities for health practices scale, general adherence measure, and health‐promoting lifestyle profile II | Health self‐efficacy is key to adjust behaviours and improve adherence. Also, behaviours in urban patients can be generalized to rural patients |
Stellefson et al. (2017) United States |
Quantitative | Understand patients eHealth literacy or ability to seek, find, understand, appraise online health information and apply knowledge | Patients registered with the COPD Foundation's National Registry (N = 1,270) | Completed surveys on sociodemographic status, socio‐cognitive status, health status, and eHealth literacy scale | Greater disease severity is associated with higher eHealth literacy, and greater educational attainment and higher COPD‐related knowledge predicts higher eHealth literacy |
van Berkel et al. (2015) Netherlands |
Qualitative | Investigate whether discussions about medicine use taking place in online message boards contribute to patient empowerment and result in more effective use of medicine | Thematic deductive analysis of 5,532 posts on seven message boards related to ADHD, ALS, and Diabetes | Message boards | Found patient empowerment processes in posts for all three disorders. Type of information shared can contribute to patient self‐efficacy with medicine use |
Willis et al. (2016) United States |
Qualitative Ethnography |
Identify factors of self‐efficacy related to self‐management behaviours found in computer‐mediated communication by people with arthritis | Sampled posts on message boards (N = 5,762) | Message boards | Three themes: Sharing experiences, suffering from symptoms, asking for help. Supports online health communities could facilitate self‐efficacy to practice arthritis self‐management |
Wilson et al. (2018) United States |
Quantitative | Evaluate participant engagement and effects of an Internet‐based, self‐direct programme for depressive symptoms among adults with chronic disease | Adults (N = 47) |
Randomly assigned to Think Clearly About Depression online self‐management programme or control group. Completed Patient Health Questionnaire and Chronic Disease Self‐efficacy Scales |
Engagement and satisfaction was favourable, depressive symptoms and self‐efficacy in the management of depressive symptoms improved for the treatment group, but not for the control group |
Win et al. (2016) Australia |
Quantitative | To identify patients' preference about the design features of effective online patient education and the benefits | Chronic disease patients or family members and health professionals (N = 215) | Online Patient Education sites (OPE) | Confirmed a set of design features to be included in OPE sites, and validated a set of health and social benefits of OPE sites |
Wu et al. (2016) Taiwan |
Quantitative Cross‐sectional Correlational |
Investigate important factors in self‐care of chronic kidney disease (CDK) and mediating effects of self‐efficacy on knowledge and self‐care | Chronic kidney disease patients (N = 247) | Participants completed the CDK self‐care Knowledge Scale, CDK Self‐efficacy Scale, CDK self‐care Scale and demographic and disease characteristics survey | Self‐efficacy crucial mediator between knowledge and self‐care and healthcare professionals should offer strategies to increase self‐efficacy |