Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2019 Jul 9;23(2):e12880. doi: 10.1111/desc.12880

Table 3.

Correlations across Time 1 and Time 2 Measures of Infant Intentional Action Understanding and Performance in the Triadic Engagement Task.

Time 1 Measures Time 2 Measures
Time 1 Measures 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
1. Failed Reach: Prop AL −.749** .367** −.334** .100 −.034 .006 −.214* .118 −.205* −.055 −.014
2. Failed Reach: Latency −.471** .437** −.091 .051 .098 .098 −.065 .156 .119 .080
3. Successful Reach: Prop AL −.914** .039 −.128 .007 .042 .250* −.238* .064 −.009
4. Successful Reach: Latency: −.072 .137 −.130 .030 −.314** .293** −.106 −.043
5. Bouts of Triadic Engagement .117 .248* −.223* .308** −.278** .306** .255*
6. Face Looks Outside Triadic .310** −.295** .045 −.075 .103 .337**
Time 2 Measures
7. Failed Reach: Prop AL −.748** .397** −.315** .253* .077
8. Failed Reach: Latency −.365** .410** −.236* −.164
9. Successful Reach: Prop AL −.863** .279** −.018
10. Successful Reach: Latency: −.351** -.025
11. Bouts of Triadic Engagement .316**
12. Face Looks Outside Triadic
**

p < .01,

*

p < .05.