Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2018 Dec 20;144:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.12.001

Table 1.

Summary and comparison of MPS systems used for functional assessment of hiPSC-CMs. For each type of MPS systems, the controllable features and measurable output are described as reported (+) or not reported (−). The number of replicates possible to derive from 106 cells is a theoretical maximum based on the loading conditions described in the representative dted studies, though for many of the smaller scale constructs, the number of replicates is more limited by the later data-acquisition processes.

Approach Type MPS Controllable features
Measurable outputs
Scalable for high throughput studies
Ref.
Spatial structures
Mechanical properties
Biochemical cues
Mechanical function
Electrophysiology
Visual observation
number of replicates that can be made from 106 cells

Cell Tissue In situ End-point analysis
Top-Down Single cell Micropatterned substrates + + + + + + + (5×103−5×105) (McCain et al., 2012; Ribeiro et al., 2015; Chopra et al., 2018)
Microfluidic & microelectrodes possible possible possible possible + + + +(5×103−5×105) Werdich et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2006; Qian et al., 2017)
2D Multicell Micropatterned and microstructured substrates + + + + + + + + +(1×104−1×105) (Stancescu et al., 2015; Alford et al., 2010; Grosberg et al., 2011;Shim et al., 2012; Feinberg et al., 2012; Lind et al., 2017b; Kujala et al., 2016)
Microfluidic heart-on-chip possible possible + + + + + +(2–20) (Marsano et al., 2016; Mathur et al., 2015, 2016)
Bottom up EHMs/EHTs + + + + + +(0.5–200) (Mannhardt et al., 2017; Huebsch et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2015a;Tiburcy et al., 2017; Boudou et al., 2012; Mills et al., 2017)
Hybrid 3D 3D bioprinting/ recellularized cardiac ECM scaffolds + + + + + + + −(0.5–2) (Borovjagin et al., 2017; Schwan et al., 2016)