Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2019 Jan 3;18(2):585–593. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00802

Figure 7: Empirical study of variability of FDR estimates.

Figure 7:

Each panel plots the standard deviation in the number of accepted target PSMs, averaged over ten mass spectrometry runs from the Kim dataset, as a function of the number of decoys used for aTDC1+. Each line corresponds to a different FDR threshold. All standard deviations are calculated over ten repetitions of either TDC+ (for 1 decoy) or aTDC1+ (for >1 decoy). Missing points correspond to cases that yielded a standard deviation of zero across all ten runs.