Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Mar 30;21(4):18. doi: 10.1007/s11936-019-0722-7

Table 1.

Extended reality device types, details, and clinical applications.

Extended Reality Classification Hardware Examples User Interface Technical Strengths Technical Limitations Clinical Applications
Virtual Reality • Oculus Rift
• HTC Vive
• Handheld motion-tracked controllers • Superior 3D graphics performance and highest resolution • User has no direct view of physical environment
• Requires controller inputs
• The Stanford Virtual Heart
• The Body VR
• MindMaze
2D Augmented Reality (Indirect) • iPhone
• iPad
• Android Devices
• Touchscreen • Widely available, inexpensive • Phone or tablet must be held or mounted
• Requires touch input
• Echocardiographic probe orientation (Kiss, 2015)
2D Augmented Reality (Direct) • Google Glass • Side-mounted touchpad
• Voice
• Lightweight head mounted display • 2D display
• UI does not interact with physical environment
• First-In-Man use in Interventional Cath (Opolski, 2016)
3D Augmented Reality • Microsoft HoloLens
• Magic Leap
• RealView Holoscope
• Voice
• Gaze
• Gestures
• Touch-free input
• 3D display
• Full visibility of surroundings
•Narrow field of view for 3D graphics • HoloAnatomy
• EchoPixel
• RealView
• Intraprocedural scar visualization (Jang, 2018)
• Enhanced Electrophysiology Visualization and Interaction System (Silva, 2017)