Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Nano. 2019 Jan 28;6(3):763–777. doi: 10.1039/C8EN01376D

Figure 4. — Elemental ratio distribution occurring in individual particles in a representative water sample (G1, 17 February 2016): (a) Ti to Al, (b) Ti to Si, (c) Ti to Fe, (d) Ti to Ce, (e) Ti to Zr, (f) Ti to Nb, (g) Ti to Ba, and (h) Ti to Pb. The average river particulate elemental ratios, average crustal elemental ratios, or elemental ratio in natural minerals are also presented for comparison. The mean elemental ratios and the number of counted particles are presented in the figures.

Figure 4. — Elemental ratio distribution occurring in individual particles in a representative water sample (G1, 17 February 2016): (a) Ti to Al, (b) Ti to Si, (c) Ti to Fe, (d) Ti to Ce, (e) Ti to Zr, (f) Ti to Nb, (g) Ti to Ba, and (h) Ti to Pb. The average river particulate elemental ratios, average crustal elemental ratios, or elemental ratio in natural minerals are also presented for comparison. The mean elemental ratios and the number of counted particles are presented in the figures.