Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Conscious Cogn. 2019 Aug 14;75:102797. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102797

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Between task correlation (Spearman’s rho) for strategic adjustments of control (boundary under accuracy emphasis – boundary under speed emphasis) in the flanker task and dot motion task. The measurement units are the absolute differences in the boundary separation parameter values. Note that the data point on the far right came from unusually low and high fitted boundary separation values under speed and accuracy emphasis respectively, leading to an apparently large strategic adjustment. However, excluding this individual from our correlational analysis had little impact on the observed effect.