Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 18;9:19399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55350-0

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The ORE is present in a mnemonic discrimination but not match-to-sample task, suggesting increasing proactive and mnemonic interference may contribute to the effect. (A) In the mnemonic discrimination task, accuracy for SR faces was significantly greater than for OR faces (p < 0.0001). (B) In the mnemonic discrimination task subjects performed more accurately on SR faces for all but the highest interference level ([20% p = 0.0011, 30% p < 0.0001, 40% p = 0.0001]). (C) In the match-to-sample task subjects recognize OR faces as well as SR faces. (D) In the match-to-sample task subjects perform equally on SR and OR faces, regardless of mnemonic interference level.