Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 31;9(11):676. doi: 10.3390/biom9110676

Table 3.

Effect of M1 (109 cells/ mL) and M2 (109 cells/ mL) on: SOD, POD, CAT, GPOX, APOX, DHAR, GST, GR, PPO in 45-days old L. esculentum plants under PPN infection. Data is presented as means of three replicates ± SD and HSD values. F ratio values, * indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 and ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01). Different letters on the graphs indicate that mean values of treatments are significantly different at p < 0.5 according to Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Treatments SOD (Mean ± SD) POD (Mean ± SD) CAT (Mean ± SD) GPOX (Mean ± SD) APOX (Mean ± SD) DHAR (Mean ± SD) GST (Mean ± SD) GR (Mean ± SD) PPO (Mean ± SD)
Control 53.44 ± 3.506 d 256.4 ± 6.612 f 54.08 ± 1.859 d 23.58 ± 0.8076 e 389.1 ± 9.030 d 136.8 ± 1.718 d 21.73 ± 1.672 e 210.5 ± 5.574 e 71.13 ± 2.373 f
N 71.97 ± 1.254 b 402.8 ± 1.859 c 70.94 ± 0.941 b 33.65 ± 1.1611 c 442.3 ± 11.220 c 150.5 ± 6.151 c 27.45 ± 1.831 c 353.9 ± 3.156 b 84.82 ± 3.642 e
M1 61.0 ± 1.787 c 349.8 ± 6.733 e 58.77 ± 3.792 c,d 27.35 ± 0.8783 d 651.0 ± 16.274 a 167.1 ± 3.257 b 32.03 ± 2.427 c 286.7 ± 9.087 c 96.28 ± 3.006 d
M1 + N 84.45 ± 2.184 a 524.2 ± 1.539 a 78.62 ± 2.826 a 36.0 ± 0.7885 b 510.9 ± 3.854 b 174.7 ± 2.368 a,b 38.04 ± 1.908 b 360.1 ± 4.650 a,b 137.7 ± 4.165 a
M2 59.33 ± 3.729 c,d 370.3 ± 1.270 d 63.14 ± 2.310 c 25.94 ± 0.3994 d 401.9 ± 2.382 d 156.7 ± 3.503 c 31.41 ± 1.5008 c,d 246.8 ± 13.211 d 111.8 ± 3.856 c
M2 + N 78.74 ± 1.727 ab 454.6 ± 6.143 b 76.50 ± 1.901 a,b 40.1 ± 0.9736 a 522.4 ± 8.446 b 183.2 ± 2.587 a 44.44 ± 2.130 a 379.8 ± 3.659 a 123.8 ± 5.584 b
F-ratio(df 1,12) T 291.8 ** 3667.7 ** 193.4 ** 720.3 ** 3.199 90.11 ** 81.78 ** 11730.7 ** 148.3 **
F-ratio(df 2,12) D 23.85 ** 849.5 ** 18.97 ** 40.77 ** 246.7 ** 113.3 4** 78.78 ** 54.79 ** 204.4 **
F-ratio(df 2,12) T × D 1.599 142.6 ** 4.795 ** 16.29 ** 155.47 ** 11.09 ** 6.881 * 37.20 ** 26.91 **
HSD 6.967 12.972 6.686 2.375 36.445 9.758 5.308 19.95 10.69