Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Jan 31;150:20–24. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.01.005

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Effects of housing on FR1 and PR performance. (A) There was an effect of housing type on discrimination index during FR1. (B) There was a main effect of housing type on number of inactive pokes. (C-F) There were no effects on active pokes, well entries, or rewards earned. (F) There was a main effect of sex and a main effect of housing type on number of reinforcers earned during PR.