Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 19;14(12):e0225882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225882

Table 2. GRADE quality of evidence for the comparative efficacy of antimalarial.

Treatment
comparison
Direct estimate; OR (95% CI) Quality of
evidence
Indirect estimate;
OR (95% CI)
Quality of
evidence
Network estimate; OR
(95% CI)
Quality of
evidence
DHP vs AL 1.29
(0.74 to 2.23)
1 fewer per 1,000
(from 2 fewer to 1 fewer)
⨁◯◯◯d,e
VERY LOW
2.5
(1.08 to 5.8)
3 fewer per 1,000
(from 6 fewer to 1 fewer)
⨁⨁◯◯a
LOW
2.5
(1.08 to 5.8)
3 fewer per 1,000
(from 6 fewer to 1 fewer)
⨁⨁◯◯a
LOW
DHP vs ASCQ NA NA 11.21
(3.40 to 36.89)
⨁◯◯◯
VERY LOW
11.21 (3.4–36.89)
11 fewer per 1,000
(from 37 fewer to 3 fewer)
⨁◯◯◯a,b,c
VERY LOW
DHP vs CQ NA NA 16.54
(5.02–54.56)
⨁⨁◯◯
LOW
16.54
(5.02 to 24.56)
17 fewer per 1,000
(from 25 fewer to 5 fewer
⨁⨁◯◯a,b
LOW
DHP vs ASSP NA NA 0.01 (0.00–0.04) ⨁⨁◯◯
LOW
0.01
(0.00 to 0.04)
0 fewer per 1,000
(from—to 0 fewer)
⨁⨁◯◯a,b
LOW
ASCQ vs AL NA NA 0.22 (0.06–0.79) ⨁⨁◯◯
LOW
0.22 (0.06–0.79)
0 fewer per 1,000
(from 1 fewer to 0 fewer)
⨁⨁◯◯a
LOW
ASAQ vs AL NA NA 5.55 (0.26–119.75) ⨁◯◯◯
VERY LOW
5.55 (0.26–119.75)
6 fewer per 1,000
(from 120 fewer to 0 fewer)
⨁◯◯◯a,b,d
VERY LOW

CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; Explanations: a. studies at unclear and high risk of bias; b. wide predictive interval; c. very wide CI; d. wide 95%CI and it crossed a null value; e: a singular study at high risk of bias; f. a singular study