Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 19;14(12):e0226230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226230

Table 2. The result of the critical appraisal for the included studies based on the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Selection Comparability Max 2* Outcomes
 No Study (First Author) Representativeness of the sample Sample Size (max 1*) Non-respondent Ascertainment of Exposure (max 2*) Assessment (max 2*) Statistical Test- confidence interval Total score
1 Abdelrahman, H., et al. (2014) [10] registry, selection bias unclear * probability of missing data high NA NA ** * 5 out of 6
2 Al-Ghamdi, A. S. (2002). [11] * * * NA NA ** Not used 5 out of 6
3 Al-Shaqsi, S., et al. (2014). [12] * * * NA ** EMS group compared to non-EMS ** * 8 out of 8
4 Al-Thani, H., et al. (2014). [13] * * * NA ** group intubated by EMS compared to group intubated by ER ** * 8 out of 8
5 Alanazi, A. F. (2012). [14] * * did not show total number, missing data unclear NA NA * Not used 3 out of 6
6 AlHabib, K. F., et al. (2014). [15] registry, selection bias unclear * * NA ** compares groups ** * 7 out of 8
7 AlHabib, K. F., et al. (2016). [16] registry, selection bias unclear * * NA **compares groups ** * 7 out of 8
8 AlHabib, K. F., et al. (2019).[17] registry, selection bias unclear * * NA ** compares groups ** * 7 out of 8
9 Alrazeeni, D. M., et al. (2016). [18] * * * NA NA ** Not used 5 out of 6
10 Althubaity, E., et al. (2013). [19] * * * NA ** compares 3 groups * 6 out of 8
11 Batt, A. M., et al. (2016). [20] * * * NA NA ** * 6 out of 6
12 Bin Salleeh, H. M., et al. (2015). [21] single center small sample * NA ** Traumatic OHCA compared to non-traumatic OHCA ** * 6 out of 8
13 Callachan, E. L., et al. (2016). [22] * * did not show total number, missing data unclear NA NA ** * 5 out of 6
14 Callachan, E. L., et al. (2016). [23] * * * NA ** EMS group compared toh non-EMS ** * 8 out of 8
15 Callachan, E. L., et al. (2017). [24] selection bias likely * did not show total number, missing data unclear NA ** ** * 6 out of 8
16 Dhaffar, K. O., et al. (2005). [25] * * probability of missing data high NA NA ** Not used 4 out of6
17 El-Menyar, Ayman., et al (2018) [26] registry, selection bias unclear * * NA **compares 2 group ** * 7 out of 8
18 Fares, S., et al. (2011). [27] registry, selection bias unclear * * NA ** EMS group compared to non-EMS ** * 8 out of 8
19 Hamam, A. F., et al. (2015). [28] * * did not show total number, missing data unclear NA NA * Not used 3 out of 6
20 Irfan, F. B., et al. (2016). [29] * * * NA ** compares 2 groups ** * 8 out of 8
21 Irfan, F. B., et al. (2017). [30] * * * NA ** compares 2 groups ** * 8 out of 8
22 Nadar, Sunil K., et al. (2018) [31] single center small sample * NA **compares 2 groups ** * 6 out of 8
23 Ong, Marcus Eng Hock, et al. (2015) [32] single center * did not show total number, missing data unclear NA NA ** * 4 out of 6
24 Shehab, A, et al. (2014) [33] registry, selection bias unclear * * NA ** compares 2 groups ** * 7 out of 8
25 Tham, L. P., et al. (2018). [34] single center small sample did not show total number, missing data unclear NA NA ** * 3 out of 6

*value equal to one for scoring, EMS: Emergency Medical Services; OHCA: out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest; NA; not applicable