Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 19;7(23):e14288. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14288

Table 1.

Cell body dimensions and dendritic branch morphology comparison

  Maximum diameter of cell body (µm) # of Primary dendrites Primary dendrites with secondary branches (%)
Sham 51.2 ± 6.7 5.2 ± 1.3 49.3 ± 19.5
Burn + DMSO (D6) 52.8 ± 10.1 4.4 ± 1.6 42.1 ± 16.4
Burn + anti‐Pak1(D6) 50.8 ± 10.0 5.8 ± 1.6 44.8 ± 17.6
Burn + DMSO (D10) 45.8 ± 7.8 4.1 ± 1.0 58.7 ± 21.2
Burn + anti‐Pak1(D10) 50.6 ± 6.4 5.2 ± 1.6 41.5 ± 15.6

To determine if there were any morphological differences across our sample neurons, we used NeuroExplorer software (MicroBrightfield, Williston, VT) to measure maximum cell diameter, number of primary dendrites, and their percentage of primary dendrites with secondary branches, and compared these morphometry values across treatment groups. Data are mean ± standard deviation (SD).

No statistical differences in any comparisons across groups (p > .05).