Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 4;20(12):1597–1615. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0931

Fig. 16. 3D MRCP using compressed sensing in 68-year-old woman.

Fig. 16

Conventional respiratory-triggered 3D MRCP using parallel imaging (A) shows substantial motion artifacts due to irregular breathing patterns, whereas breath-hold 3D MRCP using compressed sensing and parallel imaging (B) shows acceptable image quality. TR/TE was 4421/699 ms for conventional respiratory-triggered 3D MRCP (A) and 1700/674 ms for breath-hold 3D MRCP (B).