Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 18;2019(12):CD001174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001174.pub4
Patient or population: Healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses and dentists)
Settings: Ambulatory and hospital care in USA, Canada, UK, France, Switzerland, Taiwan, Australia, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Spain and Thailand
Intervention: Manual paper reminders added to other QI intervention (feedback, patient reminders, educational meetings, educational materials, test request forms)
Comparison: other QI intervention ((feedback, patient reminders, educational meetings, educational materials, test request forms)
Quality assessment Effect Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE) Importance
Number of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations
Professional practice: dichotomous process adherence outcomes
12 studies 7 cluster‐randomised trials, 5 individually‐randomised trials Serious limitations (−1) Some inconsistency (−0.5) No serious indirectness Some imprecision (−0.5) None Median improvement
 (IQR): 4.2% (IQR −1.1% to 5.5%) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low IMPORTANT
Professional practice: continuous outcomes
2 studies 1 cluster‐randomised trial, 1 individually‐randomised trial No serious limitations No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious imprecision
(−1)
None Median standardised mean difference (IQR): 0.28 (0.04 to 0.51) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate IMPORTANT
Patient outcomes: dichotomous
2 studies 1 cluster‐randomised trial, 1 individually‐randomised trial No serious limitations Serious inconsistency
(−1)
No serious indirectness Serious imprecision
(−1)
None Median improvement (IQR): −3.2% (−8.5% to 2.2%) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low CRITICAL
Patient outcomes: continuous
1 study 1 individually‐randomised trial No serious limitations Not applicable No serious indirectness Serious imprecision None Median standardised mean difference (IQR): 0.001 (−0.003 to 0.003) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate CRITICAL
Adverse effects
Not reported IMPORTANT
Resource use
2 studies 1 cluster‐randomised trial, 1 individually‐randomised trial No serious No serious inconsistency Serious indirectness
(−1)
Serious imprecision
(−1)
None Additional health service costs of GBP 30 and between EUR 16.5 and EUR 67 ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low IMPORTANT
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.