Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 19;9:19443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55924-y

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Two methods of shear were used for varying testing conditions. (a) The effect of stress magnitude was examined with a viscometer designed for uniform shear with G1 = G2, G3 was machined to give a volume average shear equal to that in the concentric cylinder and cone-and-plate sections. (b) The high shear region in the microfluidic channels were varied in length, from 0.7 to 11.6 mm, to vary time of shear to RBCs at a shear rate of 100,000 s−1. A control for the microfluidic devices with no high shear region was also used.