Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jun 20;46(3):455–475. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000735

Table 1.

Results of the regression analyses on relative thresholds and false alarm rates from the practice sessions for all four observers and all three target-present stimuli in Experiment 1. Note that all β^ values were reliably different from 0 (p < .05) except for those marked with +.

Relative Threshold False Alarm Rate
Observer Stimulus Intercept β^ R2 Intercept β^ R2
1 top 0.13 −1.25 0.93 −2.18 0.30 0.58
bottom −0.07 −1.30 0.91 −1.80 0.14 0.57
both −0.25 −1.17 0.90 −2.32 0.35 0.48
2 top −0.71 −0.45 0.36 −2.34 0.12+ 0.34
bottom −0.15 −1.21 0.80 −3.05 0.51 0.66
both −0.81 −0.59 0.46 −3.07 0.51 0.62
3 top 1.07 −1.82 0.91 −2.44 0.33 0.42
bottom 0.38 −1.53 0.91 −2.03 0.18 0.17
both 0.34 −1.44 0.92 −2.13 0.20 0.15
4 top 0.91 −1.59 0.87 −2.00 0.25 0.58
bottom 0.79 −0.93 0.62 −1.70 0.10+ 0.36
both 1.22 −1.55 0.77 −2.07 0.26 0.48
X¯ 0.78 0.45