Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jun 20;46(3):455–475. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000735

Table 4.

Experiment 1: Final inferences from the hierarchical model fitting to the data from each observer, at each time point and level of contrast.

Presservation of
Test Obs Contrast PI PS DS Parms ln(L) AIC
Baseline 1 10 T T T 4 −1453.76 2915.51
50 T T T 4 −1210.74 2429.48
2 10 T T T 4 −1508.57 2915.51
50 T T T 4 −1336.18 2680.35
3 10 T T T 4 −1472.05 2952.11
50 T T T 4 −1226.02 2460.05
4 10 T T T 4 −1541.55 3091.11
50 T T T 4 −1299.68 2607.36
violations 0 0 0
Endline 1 threshold T T T 4 −1502.66 3013.31
10 T F: Top T 5 −1069.95 2149.90
50 T F: Top T 5 −965.45 1940.90
2 threshold T F: Top T 5 −1469.53 2949.05
10 T F: Top F: Top 6 −1289.52 2591.03
50 T F: Top F: Top 6 −1047.88 2107.76
3 threshold T T T 4 −1245.90 2499.80
10 T F: Top F: Top 6 −969.70 1957.41
50 T F: Top F: Top 6 −653.46 1320.92
4 threshold T T T 4 −1541.55 3091.11
10 T F: Top F: Top 6 −1205.35 2422.70
50 T F: Top F: Top 6 −1205.33 2424.65
violations 0 9 6