Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jun 20;46(3):455–475. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000735

Table 5.

Results of the regression analyses on relative thresholds and false alarm rates from the practice sessions for all four observers and all three target-present stimuli in Experiment 2. Note that all β^ values were reliably different from 0 (p < .05) except for those marked with+.

Threshold False Alarms
Observer Stimulus Intercept β^ R2 Intercept β^ R2
1 top 0.476 −1.764 0.92 −2.471 0.378 0.58
bottom 0.128 −1.376 0.91 −2.187 0.277 0.50
both −0.467 −1.184 0.86 −2.187 0.280 0.52
2 top 0.875 −1.929 0.92 −1.834 0.225 0.58
bottom 0.876 −1.836 0.92 −1.890 0.231 0.51
both 0.143 −1.405 0.97 −3.088 0.825 0.61
3 top −0.129 −0.224 0.24 −1.655 −0.179+ 0.12
bottom 0.003 −0.231 0.28 −1.827 −0.081+ 0.02
both 0.834 −0.269 0.18 −1.764 −0.221+ 0.20
4 top 0.247 −1.327 0.58 −1.893 0.042+ 0.02
bottom 0.286 −1.619 0.95 −1.835 0.034+ 0.02
both −0.342 −0.507 0.66 −2.631 0.266 0.34
X¯ 0.70 0.34